|
Mutual
Funds and Foregone Earnings
Foregone earnings are the earnings shareholders would have realized if the
retained annual expenses continued earning income. The
annual expenses retained by the mutual fund are insignificant relative to the
losses generated by foregone earnings over a long time period (10-30 years).
A mutual fund cost calculator was used
to estimate annual expenses and foregone earnings of a $10,000 investment
placed in a fund that yielded 12% (net or adjusted), refer to the chart below.

From
year 2 to 5 the foregone earnings rapidly overtake the annual expenses as the
majority of the total costs associated with the expense ratio. The
expense ratio is an unavoidable cost of doing business with a mutual fund.
Nonetheless, the fund with a lower expense ratio will generate a higher
return, all things being equal. This is a very important concept to understand
when one is evaluating index mutual funds.
Index
Mutual Funds and Expense Ratios
Index
mutual funds are portfolios that mirror an index. For example, the Vanguard
Index Trust 500 Fund invests your money into the stocks that make-up the
S&P 500 Index. These funds are not actively managed by a fund manager.
Therefore, the expense ratio associated with these funds is much lower
(~0.2%) than with actively managed funds (1.5-2.5%).
 |
Be aware
of mutual fund companies that offer S&P 500 Index funds with a high expense ratio (>0.25%).
It is not uncommon to find a mutual fund that has created an S&P 500
Index that has an expense ratio of 0.8% or higher. |
Investors
will realize a higher return by investing in the index fund that has the
lowest expense ratio, refer to the table below.
| Actual index
fund return |
Investor's return
(net return)
(low expense ratio (0.2% expense ratio)
|
Investor's return
(net return)
(high expense ratio (0.8% expense ratio)
|
| 12% |
11.8% |
11.2% |
The
difference may not seem significant, but over the long-term it can add up to a
tremendous amount of money. For example, assume an initial investment of
$10,000 was placed into an S&P 500 Index fund managed by "Ultimate Funds"
(expense ratio of 0.2%) and a second $10,000 was placed into an S&P 500
Index fund managed by "High Cost Funds" (expense ratio of 0.8%) 30 years ago.
The Index returned 12.7% over the last 30 years. The results of the experiment
are given below.
| Actual S&P 500 Index return
(12.7%)
|
Ultimate Funds return |
High Costs Funds return |
Difference between Ultimate
and High Cost Funds |
| $361,174 |
$340,121 |
$283,836 |
$56,285 |
The
seemingly small difference between the two fund companies added up to $56,285
over 30 years!
 |
Do
not invest into index mutual funds that maintain high expense ratios!
|
Every mutual fund company that
offers an S&P 500 Index will
realize the same actual return. The index fund that maintains the lowest
expense ratio will provide the highest return, refer to the plot
below.

The
Vanguard mutual fund company has created the Vanguard 500 Trust Fund which is
an S&P 500 Index fund.
The expense ratio associated with this fund, 0.2%, is one of the lowest in the
entire industry. Consider index fund expense ratios of 0.25% as a benchmark.
Shop around and buy the index fund that maintains the lowest expense ratio.
Remember, index funds generate lower returns relative to aggressive funds.
Long-term investors should buy aggressive funds that yielded net returns of
at least 18% over the last 18 years (net return = actual return - expense
ratio).
 |
Funds
normally report net returns. |
In
summary, over the
long-term, expense ratios will significantly reduce the potential return
earned in an index mutual fund. If you are going to invest in an index fund,
choose the fund company that offers the lowest expense ratio.
|